Perceptions of Resistance Training Amongst Female Health Club Patrons
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12922/jshp.v3i3.72Keywords:
perception, resistance training, female, ACSM recommendations, aerobic exerciseAbstract
Background: Resistance training (RT) is a widely accepted component of a well-rounded exercise routine. Anecdotal information suggests that females typically view RT as a masculine activity. Purpose: The purpose of this study was to examine why females who are already engaged in an exercise routine are reluctant to embrace RT. Methods: Ninety-four (N=94) participants completed a 37-item questionnaire, developed to assess female perceptions of RT. The instrument was designed to gather information on demographics, the participants’ knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs towards RT. The questionnaire was administered at three fitness facilities. Analyses were conducted using descriptive frequencies, independent sample t-test, and chi square tests. Results: A significant difference (p ≤ 0.001) was found between the participants who met the American College of Sports Medicine’s (ACSM) recommendations and those who did not. For moderate intensity aerobic exercise duration, 59.6% of participants did not meet the ACSM recommendation (mean = 83.62 min/week). For conventional strength training frequency, 75.6% of the participants met the ACSM recommendations for RT. For functional strength training frequency, 51.0% of participants did not meet the ACSM recommendations for RT. Conclusion: females, who met the ACSM’s recommendations for RT, did not for aerobic exercise. Females displayed knowledge of RT and did not report belief in the misconceptions of RT. Further research is needed to determine why females are participating in sufficient levels of RT, but not aerobic exercise. More detailed research should also be conducted to determine if females are participating in the adequate volume of RT.
References
Ahmed C, Hilton W, Pituch K. Relations of strength training to body image among a sample of female university students. J Strength Cond Res. 2002;16(4):645-648.
Almstedt HC, Canepa JA, Ramirez DA, Shoepe TC. Changes in bone mineral density in response to 24 weeks of resistance training in college-age men and women. J Strength Cond Res. 2011;25(4):1098-1103.
American Heart Association. Physical activity and public health: updated recommendation for adults from the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2007; 116: 1083-1084. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.185649.
Byrne HK, Wilmore JH. The effects of resistance training on resting blood pressure in women. J Strength Cond Res. 2000;14(4):411-418.
Chevan, J. Demographic determinants of participation in strength training activities among U.S. adults. J Strength Cond Res. 2008;22(2):553-558.
Cottrell RD, McKenzie JF. Theory and research. In: Health Promotion & Education Research Methods: Using the Five-Chapter Thesis/Dissertation Model. 2nd ed. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, LLC; 2011: 67.
Faigenbaum AD. Age- and sex-related differences and their implications for resistance exercise. In: Baechle TR, Earle RW, eds. National Strength and Conditioning Association’s Essentials of Strength Training and Conditioning. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2008:141-158.
Harne AJ, Bixby WR. The benefits of and barriers to strength training among college-age women. Journal of Sport Behavior. 2005;28(2):151-166.
Holviala JHS, Sallinen JM, Kraemer WJ, Alen MJ, Häkkinen KKT. Effects of strength training on muscle strength characteristics, functional capabilities, and balance in middle-aged and older women. J Strength Cond Res. 2006;20(2):336-344.
Jones MT, Matthews TD, Murray M, Raalte JV, Jensen BE. Psychological correlates of performance in female athletes during a 12-week off-season strength and conditioning program. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(3):619-628.
Kraemer WJ, Ratamess N, Fry AC, Triplett-McBride T, Koziris LP, Bauer JA, Lynch JM, Fleck SJ. Influence of resistance training volume and periodization on physiological and performance adaptations in collegiate women tennis players. American J Sports Med. 2000;28(5):626-633.
Krane V, Choi PYL, Baird SM, Aimar CM, Kauer KJ. Living the paradox: female athletes negotiate femininity and muscularity. Sex Roles. 2004;50(5/6):315-329.
Levinger I, Goodman C, Hare DL, Jerums G, Morris T, Selig S. Psychological responses to acute resistance exercise in men and women who are obese. J Strength Cond Res. 2009;23(5):1548-1552.
Myer GD, Ford KR, Palumbo JP, Hewett TE. Neuromuscular training improves performance and lower-extremity biomechanics in female athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19(1):51-60.
Poiss CC, Sullivan PA, Paup DC, Westerman BJ. Perceived importance of weight training to selected NCAA Division III men and women student-athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(1):108-114.
Santos E, Rhea MR, Simāo R, Dias I, Freitas de Salles B, Novaes J, Leite T, Blair JC, Bunker DJ. Influence of moderately intense strength training on flexibility in sedentary young women. J Strength Cond Res. 2010;24(11):3144-3149.
Smith CD. Relationship of knowledge of strength training to adolescent perceptions of appropriateness and attractiveness of female muscularity. Smart Online Journal. 2005;1(2):14-22. Available from: http://www.thesmartjournal.com/body%20image.pdf. Accessed November 11, 2012.
Stone WJ, Coulter SP. Strength/endurance effects from three resistance training protocols with women. J Strength Cond Res. 1994;8(4):231-234.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
