Virtual Environments (VEs): The Potentials and Challenges for Use in Cognitive Rehabilitation of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12922/jshp.v2i2.41Keywords:
rehabilitation, telerehabilitation, virtual reality, virtual environments, cognitionAbstract
Virtual Environments (VEs): The Potentials and Challenges for Use in Cognitive Rehabilitation of Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs)References
Parsons T. Neuropsychological Assessment using Virtual Environments: Enhanced Assessment Technology for Improved Ecological Validity. Verlag Berlin Heidelberg: Springer; 2011.
Tanelian T, Jaycox L, editors. Invisible wounds of war: Psychological and cognitive injuries, their consequences, and services to assist recovery. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Monographs; 2008.
Parsons T, McPherson S, Interrante V. Enhancing Neurocognitive Assessment Using Immersive Virtual Reality. 17th IEEE Virtual Reality Conference: Workshop on Virtual and Augmented Assistive Technology (VAAT); 2013; 2013. p. 1-7.
Jacoby M, Averbuch S, Sacher Y, Katz N, Weiss P, Kizony R. Effectiveness of Executive Functions Training Within a Virtual Supermarket for Adults With Traumatic Brain Injury: A Pilot Study. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL SYSTEMS AND REHABILITATION ENGINEERING March 2013; 21(2).
Lee JH, Ku J, Cho W, et al. A virtual reality system for the assessment and rehabilitation of the activities of daily living. Cyberpsychology & behavior : the impact of the Internet, multimedia and virtual reality on behavior and society 2003; 6(4): 383-8.
Levy C, Shivashankar H, Kotranza A, et al. Development of therapeutic grocery store to treat cognitive and emotional dysfunction in mild traumatic brain injury and post traumatic stress disorder. Prototype progress report. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2011; 3: S180.
Levy C, Dixit N, Hundersmarck T, et al. Virtual Environments for Therapeutic Solutions (VETS) mTBI/PTSD Phase II. Gainesville, FL: Department of Veterans Affairs; 2013.
Rose F, Attree E, Brooks B, Johnson D. Virtual environments in brain damage rehabilitation: A rationale from basic neuroscience. In: Giuseppe R, Wiederhold B, Molinari E, eds. Virtual environments in clinical psychology and neuroscience. Amersterdam, Netherlands: IOS Press; 1998.
Burgess P, Alderman N, Forbes C, et al. The case for the development and use of “ecologically valid” measures of executive function in experimental and clinical neuropsychology. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2006; 12: 194-209.
Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research : applications to practice. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Pearson/Prentice Hall; 2009.
Shaffer BT, Cohen MS, Bigelow DC, Ruckenstein MJ. Validation of a disease-specific quality-of-life instrument for acoustic neuroma: the Penn Acoustic Neuroma Quality-of-Life Scale. The Laryngoscope 2010; 120(8): 1646-54.
Carlton J. Developing the draft descriptive system for the child amblyopia treatment questionnaire (CAT-qol): a mixed methods study. Health and quality of life outcomes 2013; 11(1): 174.
Prior ME, Hamzah JC, Francis JJ, et al. Pre-validation methods for developing a patient reported outcome instrument. Bmc Med Res Methodol 2011; 11.
Rand D, Katz N, Weiss PL. Evaluation of virtual shopping in the VMall: comparison of post-stroke participants to healthy control groups. Disability and rehabilitation 2007; 29(22): 1710-9.
Kroll T, Barbour R, Harris J. Using focus groups in disability research. Qualitative Health Research 2007; 17: 690-8.
Krueger R, Casey M. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. London: Sage; 2000.
DeWalt DA, Rothrock N, Yount S, Stone AA, Group PC. Evaluation of item candidates: the PROMIS qualitative item review. Medical care 2007; 45(5 Suppl 1): S12-21.
Rand D, Rukan S, Weiss P, Katz N. Validation of the Virtual MET as an assessment tool for executive functions. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation 2009; 19(4): 583-602.
Johnsen K, Raij A, Stevens A, Lind D, Lok B. The Validity of a Virtual Human Experience for Interpersonal Skills Education. SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems; 2007; New York, NY: ACM Press; 2007. p. 1049-58.
Hart DL, Wang YC, Stratford PW, Mioduski JE. Computerized adaptive test for patients with knee impairments produced valid and responsive measures of function. Journal of clinical epidemiology 2008; 61(11): 1113-24.
Hart DL, Wang YC, Stratford PW, Mioduski JE. A computerized adaptive test for patients with hip impairments produced valid and responsive measures of function. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2008; 89(11): 2129-39.
Hart DL, Wang YC, Stratford PW, Mioduski JE. Computerized adaptive test for patients with foot or ankle impairments produced valid and responsive measures of function. Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation 2008; 17(8): 1081-91.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
