Physiological assessment of Soldiers wearing military uniforms of different fabrics during intermittent exercise
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12922/jshp.v8i1.167Keywords:
skin wettedness, sweat response, body temperature, skin temperatureAbstract
Quantifying the relationship between the physical properties of clothing worn at or near comfortable conditions to the wearer’s physiological responses is of significant interest to a broad range of users and developers. This study developed and evaluated methods for quantifying these relationships. The physiological responses of nine healthy Soldier Volunteers (1 female, 8 males) (23 ± 4 yr; 174.2 ± 5.8 cm; 73.4 ± 6.5 kg; 17.90 ± 3.99% body fat) were collected and analyzed during sitting (rest) and activity. Soldiers repeated four chamber trials while wearing four different style uniforms with different material properties. The thermal and evaporative resistances and physical properties were evaluated for each ensemble prior to testing. During each trial, Soldiers alternated walking on a treadmill at 1.34 m×s-1 (3 mph) for 30 minutes, then sitting for 10 minutes. That test sequence was repeated four times, for a total of 170 min. Testing was conducted controlled climate chambers in two environmental conditions: a neutral condition (NC) with an air temperature (Ta) of 20°C, and relative humidity (RH) of 50%, and wind velocity (Vw) of 1.1 ms-1, and a warm humid (WH) condition (27°C, 75% RH, Vw 1.1 ms-1). Minute-by-minute measures of rectal temperature (Tre) were collected, along with continuous measures of relative humidity under clothing (RHuc), and skin temperature (Tsk) measured at 3 sites. Total body temperature (Tb) was calculated from Tre and mean Tsk (sk), and skin wettedness (ω) was calculated from RHuc and Tsk. Although there were a few overall significant differences (a ≤ 0.5) for Tre, Tsk, Tb, RHuc or ω, post hoc testing (Tukey’s Studentized Range Test, a ≤ 0.5) indicated no significant differences between any two garments. Results for sweating, water loss and retention in clothing for the NC (20°C) environment were not significant. For the WH (27°C) environment, differences for sweat retained in clothing (Swcl) were significant between the wool garment and each of the other 3 garments. Between clothing fabric types there was also significant difference in the rate of evaporative water loss (Rev).
References
Eissing G. Climatic assessment indices. Ergonomics, 38(1):47-57, 1995.
Goldman RF. Introduction to heat-related problems in military operations. Medical aspects of harsh environments. 2001;1:3-49.
Potter AW, Blanchard LA, Friedl KE, Cadarette BS, and Hoyt RW. Mathematical prediction of core body temperature from environment, activity, and clothing: The heat strain decision aid (HSDA). Journal of Thermal Biology, 64: 78-85, 2017.
US Army Regulation (AR 600-9). The Army Body Composition Program. Department of the Army, Washington, DC; 28 June 2013.
Vogel, J.A., J.W. Kirkpatrick, P.I. Fitzgerald, J.A. Hodgdon, and E.A. Harmon. Derivation of anthropometry based body fat equations for the Army’s weight control program. Natick, MA: U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Technical Report T17-88, 1988.
Ramanathan, N.L. A new weighting system for mean surface temperature of the human body. Journal of Applied Physiology, 19(3):531-533, 1964.
Berglund LG, Cunningham DJ. Parameters of human discomfort in warm environments. ASHRAE Trans.;(United States). 1986 Jan 1;92(CONF-8606125-).
Berglund, L.G. Comfort and Humidity. ASHRAE J. 40(8): 35-41, 1998.
Santee, W.R., L.G. Berglund, A. Cardello, C.A. Winterhalter, T.L. Endrusick. Physiological And Comfort Assessments Of Volunteers Wearing Battle-Dress (BDU) Uniforms Of Different Fabrics During Intermittent Exercise. Natick, MA: U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine Technical Report T06-6, 2006.
ASTM International. F1291-16 Standard test method for measuring the thermal insulation of clothing using a heated manikin, 2016. http://www.astm.org/Standards/F1291.htm
ASTM International. F2370-16 Standard test method for measuring the evaporative resistance of clothing using a sweating manikin, 2016. http://www.astm.org/Standards/F2370.htm
Woodcock AH. Moisture Permeability Index - A New Index for Describing Evaporative Heat Transfer Through Fabric Systems. Technical Report TR-EP-149, Quartermaster Research and Engineering Command, Natick, MA, ADA#0265286, 1961.
Woodcock AH. Moisture transfer in textile systems, Part I. Textile Research Journal, 32:628-633, 1962.
Potter AW, Karis AJ, and Gonzalez JA. Biophysical characterization and predicted human thermal responses to U.S. Army body armor protection levels (BAPL). U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA 01760 USA, Technical Report, T13-5, 2013, ADA#585406
Potter AW, Hunt AP, Cadarette BS, Fogarty A, Srinivasan S, Santee WR, Blanchard LA, and Looney DP. Heat Strain Decision Aid (HSDA) accurately predicts individual-based core body temperature rise while wearing chemical protective clothing. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 107: 131-139, 2019.
Potter AW, Hunt AP, Rioux TP, Looney DP, and Fogarty AL. Interlaboratory Manikin Testing, Mathematical Modeling, and Human Research Data. US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA, 01760, USA, Technical Report, T18-03, 2018. AD1052856
Santee, W.R. and L.A. Blanchard. Thermal properties of handwear at varying altitudes. Aviation, Space and Environmental Medicine, 72: 576-578, 2001.
Potter AW, Gonzalez JA, Chin Suey DR, Looney DP, Castellani MP, Blanchard LA, and Santee WR. Quantitative assessment of the meaningful differences in evaporative potential. U.S. Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine, Natick, MA 01760 USA, Technical Report, T20-03, 2019.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).