The type of injuries sustained in the Texas A&M Corps of Cadets during an academic semseter
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12922/jshp.v6i1.137Keywords:
Military, Injury, Injury Prevention, Reserve Officer Training Program (ROTC), Corps of Cadets (CoC)Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Injuries during military training is a major problem, affecting readiness. Researchers have attempted to determine the various types of injuries that occur during initial basic training and for specialized training for all branches of the military. However, there is a relatively little study specifically conducted addressing Reserved Officer Training Corps (ROTC). The purpose of this investigation was to determine specific types of injuries sustained in the Corps of Cadets (CoC) at Texas A&M University over the course of a fall semester. METHODS: 2,450 cadets were included in this study. Injured cadets that could not participate in their physical training were asked to complete an injury profile questionnaire. These questionnaires were collected and used to determine injury rates. RESULTS: Over the course of the semester, 152 cadets (6.2%) sustained injuries. Injury rates and body part distributions were calculated. However, some cadets fit into more than one category. Cadets suffered injuries to specific muscle groups (32.3%), joints (43.3%), bones (9.5%), skin (1.5%), and tendons/ ligaments (40.3%). Two cadets experienced a heat-related illness during training while the remaining (8.5%) missed training due to a non-injury-related illness. DISCUSSION: This study found knee and ankle joint injuries to be the most prevalent. This finding is consistent with research studies of initial enlisted and officer training.
References
Canham-Chervak, M., et al., A systematic process to prioritize prevention activities: sustaining progress toward the reduction of military injuries. American journal of preventive medicine, 2010. 38(1): p. S11-S18.
Bullock, S.H., et al., Prevention of physical training–related injuries: recommendations for the military and other active populations based on expedited systematic reviews. American journal of preventive medicine, 2010. 38(1): p. S156-S181.
Hauret, K.G., et al., Musculoskeletal injuries: description of an under-recognized injury problem among military personnel. American journal of preventive medicine, 2010. 38(1): p. S61-S70.
Jones, B.H., M. Canham-Chervak, and D.A. Sleet, An evidence-based public health approach to injury priorities and prevention: recommendations for the US military. American journal of preventive medicine, 2010. 38(1): p. S1-S10.
Jacobs, J.M., K.L. Cameron, and J.A. Bojescul, Lower extremity stress fractures in the military. Clinics in sports medicine, 2014. 33(4): p. 591-613.
Ruscio, B.A., et al., A process to identify military injury prevention priorities based on injury type and limited duty days. American journal of preventive medicine, 2010. 38(1): p. S19-S33.
Beck, T., et al., Stress fracture in military recruits: gender differences in muscle and bone susceptibility factors. Bone, 2000. 27(3): p. 437-444.
Bell, N.S., et al., High injury rates among female army trainees: a function of gender? American journal of preventive medicine, 2000. 18(3): p. 141-146.
Finestone, A., et al., Overuse injuries in female infantry recruits during low-intensity basic training. Medicine and science in sports and exercise, 2008. 40(11 Suppl): p. S630-5.
Hoffman, J.R., et al., The effect of leg strength on the incidence of lower extremity overuse injuries during military training. Military medicine, 1999. 164(2): p. 153.
Reynolds, K.L., et al., Injuries and risk factors in a 100-mile (161-km) infantry road march. Preventive medicine, 1999. 28(2): p. 167-173.
Reynolds, K., Injuries and risk factors in an 18-day Marine winter mountain training exercise. Military medicine, 2000. 165(12): p. 905.
Reynolds, K., Injury occurrence and risk factors in construction engineers and combat artillery soldiers. Military medicine, 2002. 167(12): p. 971.
Rosendal, L., et al., Incidence of injury and physical performance adaptations during military training. Clinical Journal of Sport Medicine, 2003. 13(3): p. 157-163.
Armstrong, D.W., et al., Stress fracture injury in young military men and women. Bone, 2004. 35(3): p. 806-816.
Betsinger, K. and M.-A. Shafer, Predictors of one-year attrition in female Marine Corps recruits. Military medicine, 2009. 174(4): p. 382.
Schneider, G.A., C. Bigelow, and P.J. Amoroso, Evaluating risk of re-injury among 1214 army airborne soldiers using a stratified survival model. American journal of preventive medicine, 2000. 18(3): p. 156-163.
Darling, G., Carter, JG, Brooks, KA, Greenwood L, and Greenwood, M. Tracking the rates for injuries and correlations for days missed of training for the Texas A&M Corps of Cadets. in NSCA National Conference. 2014. Las Vegas, NV.
Cosman, F., et al., Determinants of stress fracture risk in United States Military Academy cadets. Bone, 2013. 55(2): p. 359-366.
Jones, B.H., et al., Prevention of lower extremity stress fractures in athletes and soldiers: a systematic review. Epidemiologic reviews, 2002. 24(2): p. 228-247.
Cosio-Lima, L., et al., Effects of a periodized training pro-gram and a traditional military train-ing program on functional movement and Y-balance tests in ROTC cadets. Sport Exerc Med Open J, 2017. 3(2): p. 46-52.
Lisman, P., et al., Functional movement screen and aerobic fitness predict injuries in military training. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, 2013. 45(4): p. 636-643.
Kaufman, K.R., S. Brodine, and R. Shaffer, Military training-related injuries: surveillance, research, and prevention. American journal of preventive medicine, 2000. 18(3): p. 54-63.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).