Sprint and Distance Zone Analysis by Position of Division I Women’s Lacrosse

Authors

  • R. Charli Rosenberg Campbell University
  • Bradley J. Myers Campbell University
  • Jennifer A. Bunn Sam Houston State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12922/jshp.v9i2.175

Keywords:

athlete monitoring, team sports, external load

Abstract

Sprint zones are measured by the number of sprints conducted in zones 1 through 5 (Sprint 1 - Sprint 5) and the distance traveled in each zone (Dist 1 - Dist 5). Zones are determined by percentage of maximum sprint speed (1<60%, 2=60-69%, 3=70-79%, 4=80-89%, 5≥90%). The purpose of this study was to compare sprint zones and speed by position in Division I women’s lacrosse during practices and games. Players (n=13) wore a vest with microtechnology (global positioning unit and heart rate monitor) to track movement and speed during 9 games and 41 practices. Players included four attackers, four midfielders, and five defenders. There were no main effect differences between training and games (p=0.288), or by an interaction with position (p=0.396). Univariate analyses showed differences between training and games for average speed (p<0.001) max speed (p=0.021), Sprint 1 (p<0.001), Sprint 2 (p<0.001), Sprint 3 (p<0.001), Sprint 4 (p<0.001), Sprint 5 (p=0.031), Dist 1 (p<0.001), Dist 2 (p<0.001), Dist 3 (p=0.001), and Dist 5 (p=0.003). All variables were higher in games than training except Sprint 5 and Dist 5 where training was higher. For the interaction between activity type and position there was a difference in Sprint 4 (p=0.032) and Sprint 2 (p=0.046), with attackers logging higher values during practice in Sprint 5 and Dist 5. There was a mismatch in sprint demands between training and games, with a greater game demand for efforts in zones 1-4 in games for all positions. These data indicate no need to train differently by position, but coaches and support staff can utilize this information to alter the structure of training to meet the demands of the game.

References

Devine NF, Hegedus EJ, Nguyen A-D, Ford KR, Taylor JB. External Match Load in Womenʼs Collegiate Lacrosse. J Strength Cond Res. 2020 epub ahead of print; 1. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000003451

Polley CS, Cormack SJ, Gabbett TJ, Polglaze T. Activity profile of high-level australian lacrosse players. J Strength Cond Res. 2015; 29(1):126–36. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000000599

Hoffman JR, Ratamess NA, Neese KL, Ross RE, Kang J, Magrelli JF, et al. Physical performance characteristics in National Collegiate Athletic Association Division III champion female lacrosse athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2009; 23(5):1524–9. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181b3391d

NCAA ® Sports Sponsorship and Participation Rates Report. 2019; Available from: www.ncaa.org

Enemark-Miller EA, Seegmiller JG, Rana SR. Physiological profile of women’s lacrosse players. J Strength Cond Res. 2009; 23(1):39–43. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0b013e318185f07c

Hauer R, Tessitore A, Hauer K, Tschan H. Activity Profile of International Female Lacrosse Players. J Strength Cond Res. 2019 epub ahead of print; 1. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0000000000003253

Sisson O, Johnston C, Noonan C, Bunn J. Lessons learned from low-cost athlete monitoring in lacrosse during a 12-week training cycle. TRENDS Sport Sci. 2018; 4(25):181–6. DOI: 10.23829/TSS.2018.25.4-2

Alphin KH, Hudgins BL, Bunn JA. Intensity classification of drills for a collegiate women’s lacrosse team: An observational study. Int J Kinesiol Sport Sci. 2019; 7(3):16–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijkss.v.7n.3p.16

Bunn JA, Myers BJ, Reagor MK. An evaluation of training load measures for drills in women’s collegiate lacrosse. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2021; 16(6):841-848. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.2020-0029

Crouch AK, Jiroutek MR, Snarr RL, Bunn JA. Relationship between pre-training wellness scores and internal and external training loads in a Division I women’s lacrosse team. J Sports Sci. 2020; 39(9):1070–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/02640414.2020.1857106

Malone S, Roe M, Doran DA, Gabbett TJ, Collins K. High chronic training loads and exposure to bouts of maximal velocity running reduce injury risk in elite Gaelic football. J Sci Med Sport. 2017; 20(3):250–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2016.08.005

Alphin KL, Sisson OM, Hudgins BL, Noonan CD, Bunn JA. Accuracy Assessment of a GPS Device for Maximum Sprint Speed. Int J Exerc Sci. 2020; 13(4):273–80.

Wing C. Monitoring athlete load: Data collection methods and practical recommendations. Strength Cond J. 2018 Aug 1;40(4):26–39. DOI: 10.1519/SSC.0000000000000384

McLellan CP, Lovell DI, Gass GC. Biochemical and endocrine responses to impact and collision during elite rugby league match play. J Strength Cond Res. 2011; 25(6):1553–62. https://doi.org/10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181db9bdd

Hamlet MD, Frick MD, Bunn JA. High-speed running density in collegiate women’s lacrosse. Res Sport Med. 2021; 29(4):386-394 . https://doi.org/10.1080/15438627.2021.1917401

Malone, S., Doran, D., Collins, K., Morton, J & McRobert A. Accuracy and Reliability of the VX Sport Global Positioning System During Intermittent Activity. Europeen College of Sports Science Annual Congress. 2014; (19):1–2.

Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Science (2nd Edition). Statistical Power Anaylsis for the Behavioral Sciences. 1988.

Downloads

Published

2021-08-16

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

How to Cite

Sprint and Distance Zone Analysis by Position of Division I Women’s Lacrosse. (2021). Journal of Sport and Human Performance, 9(2), 51-57. https://doi.org/10.12922/jshp.v9i2.175