Intra-cyclic analysis of the backstroke swimming technique with an inertial measurement unit

Authors

  • André Engel
  • Nina Schaffert University of Hamburg Faculty of Psychology and Human Movement Science Institute of Human Movement Science Dept. Movement and Training Science http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9588-5969
  • Roy Ploigt BeSB Sound and Vibration GmbH
  • Klaus Mattes University of Hamburg Faculty of Psychology and Human Movement Science Institute of Human Movement Science Dept. Movement and Training Science

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12922/jshp.v9i1.168

Keywords:

IMU, intra-cyclic analysis, Backstroke, Swimming, Movement Technique, acceleration

Abstract

Over the past decades, the use of video to monitor and analyze the performance in swimming has become the gold standard of motion analysis. Due to the high cost of a professional video system as well as the time and expertise required to evaluate performance relevant parameters, these systems are only available to athletes at international level.

To enable training analysis also for athletes at national level, more cost-effective systems such as Inertial Measurement Units (IMU) are becoming more and more important. The advantage of these systems is that they are easily accessible and offer the possibility to automatically analyze the movement of a swimmer.

The current study addresses backstroke swimming and transfers the knowledge gained through video analysis to the data measured with an IMU. The focus is on intra-cyclic characteristics such as the body's side-to-side roll, angular velocity and forward acceleration. Ten athletes from regional to national level swam 100 m backstroke with an IMU positioned on the lower back and were simultaneously recorded on video. The IMU data obtained was linked to the video to identify key positions during a swimming stroke cycle and to find similarities and differences between the swimmers. The findings are the basis for the development of an automatic pattern recognition system that provides coaches and scientists with direct, real-time feedback on the execution of swim movements. In addition, it provides information on which parameters should be specifically trained to improve performance.

References

REFERENCES

Bächlin M, Tröster G. Swimming performance and technique evaluation with wearable acceleration sensors. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 2012; 8(1):68-81.

Bächlin M, Förster K, Tröster G. SwimMaster: a wearable assistant for swimmer. In: Helal s, editor. Proceedings of the 11th international conference on Ubiquitous computing, 2009 Sep 30 – Oct 3; Orlando, USA. ACM; p.215-224.

Chakravorti N, Le Sage T, Slawson SE, Conway PP, West AA. Design and implementation of an integrated performance monitoring tool for swimming to extract stroke information at real time. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems 2013; 43(2):199-213.

Chollet D, Chalies S, Chatard JC. A new index of coordination for the crawl: description and usefulness. International Journal of Sports Medicine 2000; 21(01):54-59.

Colman V, Persyn U, Ungerechts BE. A mass of water added to the swimmer's mass to estimate the velocity in dolphin-like swimming below the water surface. In Keskinen KL, Komi PV, Hollander, AP, editors. Biomechanics and medicine in swimming III. Proceedings of the VIII International Symposium on Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming. Jyväskylä, Finland. 1999. p. 89-94.

Counsilman JE, Wilke K. Handbuch des Sportschwimmens für Trainer, Lehrer und Athleten: zur schwimmsportlichen Trainings- u. Bewegungslehre. Schwimmsport-Verlag Fahnemann; 1980. German.

Dadashi F, Crettenand F, Millet GP, Seifert L, Komar J, Aminian K. Automatic front-crawl temporal phase detection using adaptive filtering of inertial signals. Journal of Sports Sciences 2013; 31(11):1251-1260.

Daukantas S, Marozas V, Lukosevicius A. Inertial sensor for objective evaluation of swimmer performance. In: Rang T, editor. Electronics Conference, 2008 Oct 6 -8; Tallinn, Estonia. IEEE. p.321-324.

Davey N, Anderson M, James DA. Validation trial of an accelerometer‐based sensor platform for swimming. Sports Technology 2008; 1(4-5):202-207.

Engel A, Schaffert N, Ploigt R, Mattes K. Intra-cyclic analysis of the front-crawl swimming technique with an inertial measurement unit. Journal of Biology of Exercise. (in print).

Engel A, Schaffert N, Ploigt R, Mattes K. Intra-cyclic analysis of the butterfly swimming technique using an inertial measurement unit. Journal of Biology of Exercise. (in print).

Engel A, Schaffert N, Ploigt R, Mattes K. Intra-cyclic analysis of the breaststroke technique with an inertial measurement unit. Journal of Biology of Exercise. (in print).

FINA, http://www.fina.org/sites/default/files/2017_2021_swimming_16032018.pdf (last time accessed: 31 July 2020).

Fulton SK, Pyne DB, Burkett B. Validity and reliability of kick count and rate in freestyle using inertial sensor technology. Journal of Sports Sciences 2009; 27(10):1051-1058.

Ganzevles S, Vullings R, Beek PJ, et al. Using tri-axial accelerometry in daily elite swim training practice. Sensors 2017; 17(5):990.

Hagem RM, O'Keefe SG, Fickenscher T, Thiel D.V. Self contained adaptable optical wireless communications system for stroke rate during swimming. IEEE Sensors Journal 2013; 13(8):3144-3151.

Hagem RM, Sabti HA, Thiel DV. Coach-Swimmer communications based on wrist mounted 2.4 GHz accelerometer sensor. Procedia Engineering 2015; 112:512-516.

James DA, Davey N, Rice T. An accelerometer-based sensor platform for insitu elite athlete performance analysis. Sensors 2004; pp.1373-1376.

jBeam, https://www.amsonline.de/de/produkte/jbeam/ (last time accessed 31 July 2020).

Jensen U, Prade F, Eskofier BM. Classification of kinematic swimming data with emphasis on resource consumption. In IEEE International Conference on Body Sensor Networks (BSN) 2013; p. 1-5.

Le Sage T, Bindel A, Conway P, Justham L, Slawson S, West A. Development of a real time system for monitoring of swimming performance. Procedia Engineering 2010; 2(2):2707-2712.

Le Sage T, Bindel A, Conway PP, Justham LM, Slawson SE, West AA. Embedded programming and real-time signal processing of swimming strokes. Sports Engineering 2011; 14(1):1.

Madsen Ö, Reischle K, Rudolph K. Wege zum Topschwimmer, Band 1 -3. Hofmann; 2014.

Magalhaes FAD, Vannozzi G, Gatta G, Fantozzi S. Wearable inertial sensors in swimming motion analysis: a systematic review. Journal of Sports Sciences 2015; 33(7):732-745.

Maglischo EW. Swimming even faster. McGraw-Hill Humanities; 1993.

Mark R. Backstroke Technique. In Riewald S, Rodeo S, editors. Science of swimming faster. Human Kinetics; 2015.

Mooney R, Corley G, Godfrey A. Inertial sensor technology for elite swimming performance analysis: A systematic review. Sensors 2015; 16(1):18.

Mooney R, Quinlan LR, Corley G, et al. Evaluation of the Finis Swimsense® and the Garmin Swim™ activity monitors for swimming performance and stroke kinematics analysis. PloS one 2018; 12(2):e0170902.

Ohgi Y, Kaneda K, Takakura A. Sensor data mining on the kinematical characteristics of the competitive swimming. Procedia Engineering 2014; 72:829-834.

Pansiot J, Lo B, Yang GZ. Swimming stroke kinematic analysis with BSN. In 2010 International Conference on Body Sensor Networks (BSN) 2010; p. 153-158.

Peiwei H. The Study on Swimming Exercises based on 3 D Accelerometer Data Analysis. International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology 2012; 4(21).

Puel F, Seifert LM, Hellard P. Validation of an inertial measurement unit for the determination of the longitudinal speed of a swimmer. In Proceedings of the XIIth International Symposium for Biomechanics and Medicine in Swimming 2014; p. 484-489.

Schramm, E. Sportschwimmen. Sportverlag; 1987. German.

Siirtola P, Laurinen P, Röning J, Kinnunen H. Efficient accelerometer-based swimming exercise tracking. In 2011 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM) 2011; p. 156-161.

Slawson SE, Justham LM, West AA, Conway PP, Caine MP, Harrison R. Accelerometer profile recognition of swimming strokes. In Estivalet M, P Brisson, editors. The engineering of sport 7. Paris, France. Berlin: Springer; 2009. p.81-87.

Stamm A, James DA, Burkett BB, Hagem RM, Thiel DV. Determining maximum push-off velocity in swimming using accelerometers. Procedia Engineering 2013; 60:201-207.

Staniak Z, Buśko K, Górski M, et al. Accelerometer profile of motion of the pelvic girdle in breaststroke swimming. Journal of Human Kinetics 2016; 52(1):147-156.

Ungerechts BE, Cesarini D, Hamann M, Ritter Y, Weidner S, Haldorn T, Hermann T. Patterns of flow pressure due to hand-water-interaction of skilled breaststroke swimmers–a preliminary study. Procedia Engineering 20

Downloads

Published

2021-04-22

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles

How to Cite

Intra-cyclic analysis of the backstroke swimming technique with an inertial measurement unit. (2021). Journal of Sport and Human Performance, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.12922/jshp.v9i1.168